Re: Abbreviated keys for Numeric

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
От Andrew Dunstan
Тема Re: Abbreviated keys for Numeric
Дата
Msg-id 55204C55.9080303@dunslane.net
обсуждение исходный текст
Ответ на Re: Abbreviated keys for Numeric  (Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com>)
Список pgsql-hackers
On 04/04/2015 04:27 PM, Robert Haas wrote:
> On Sat, Apr 4, 2015 at 10:27 AM, Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote:
>>> I see nothing in the win32 stuff that tries to define USE_FLOAT8_BYVAL
>>> on 64-bit windows, is this just an oversight or does it not actually
>>> work there? or is it for on-disk compatibility with 32-bit windows?
>> That flag doesn't affect on-disk compatibility.  It could certainly break
>> third-party extensions, but we accept the same hazard on non-Windows with
>> equanimity.  I suspect this point simply wasn't revisited when we added
>> support for 64-bit Windows.
>>
>> Having said that, I'm fine with leaving this as-is, if only because
>> it means we're exercising the --disable-float8-byval code paths in
>> the buildfarm ;-)
> But... are we?  I mean, I don't see anything in the Windows code that
> defines USE_FLOAT8_BYVAL.
>
> (Admittedly, if we're not, I have no theory for why that patch fixed
> anything, but all the same I don't see where it's getting defined.)
>

See src/tools/msvc/Solution.pm

cheers

andrew



В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления:

Предыдущее
От: Andrew Dunstan
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: Abbreviated keys for Numeric
Следующее
От: Peter Geoghegan
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: Abbreviated keys for Numeric