At the PGCon Developer Meeting it was agreed[0] to add a list of credits
to the release notes, including everyone who was mentioned in a commit
message. I have now completed that list.
Attached is the proposed documentation commit as well as the raw list.
Thoughts on the heading? I have considered "Credits",
"Acknowledgements", "Thanks", but the first seemed better than the other
ones.
This was a manual process, so mistakes could have been made. I have
gently edited variant spellings and obvious typos.
For the following mentions I could not identify a name:
mthrockmorton@hme.com
Tels
Zertrin <postgres_wiki@zertrin.org>
zam6ak@gmail.com
bug #14654 reported by James C.
Jov in bug #14749
yxq <yxq@o2.pl>
I respect that some people don't want their name on record, but then
they don't go into the release credits either, I think.
The considered commits have been
git log REL9_6_STABLE..REL_10_STABLE
currently up to 9ebc7781444fd15d56ed16e5312a954483e85cd9.
I have also cross-checked the list against all PG10 commit fests, the
committers list, and the contributors list on the web site. (That
doesn't mean I added all those, but checked for obvious omissions
against those.)
The list is sorted using COLLATE "en-x-icu".
Any thoughts?
[0]:
https://wiki.postgresql.org/wiki/PgCon_2017_Developer_Meeting#Release_notes_scope.2C_and_giving_credit
--
Peter Eisentraut http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/
PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Remote DBA, Training & Services
--
Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers