Re: slow server : s_lock and _bt_checkkeys on perf top

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
От Jim Nasby
Тема Re: slow server : s_lock and _bt_checkkeys on perf top
Дата
Msg-id 54F902F6.6040608@BlueTreble.com
обсуждение исходный текст
Ответ на slow server : s_lock and _bt_checkkeys on perf top  (Soni M <diptatapa@gmail.com>)
Список pgsql-performance
On 3/4/15 1:31 PM, Soni M wrote:
> Hello All,
>
> Master db size 1.5 TB
> All postgres 9.1.13 installed from RHEL package.
> It has streaming replica and slony replica to another servers.
>
> Server performance is slower than usual, before that, there's a big
> query got cancelled and then performance get slow.
>
> No sign of IO wait.
>
> on sar, it's %user and %system dominate the cpu usage
> 01:25:04 PM     CPU     %user     %nice   %system   %iowait    %steal
>    %idle
> Average:        all     51.91      0.00     12.03      0.66      0.00
>    35.39
>
> on perf top, i saw
>   18.93%  postgres                                  [.] s_lock
>   10.72%  postgres                                  [.] _bt_checkkeys
> almost always at top.

_bt_checkkeys is the function that compares a row in a btree index to a
condition. s_lock is a spinlock; the high CPU usage in there indicates
there's heavy lock contention somewhere.

Is there one PG process that's clearly using more CPU than the others?
What else is running in the database? Are there any unusual data types
involved?
--
Jim Nasby, Data Architect, Blue Treble Consulting
Data in Trouble? Get it in Treble! http://BlueTreble.com


В списке pgsql-performance по дате отправления:

Предыдущее
От: Tom Lane
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: EXPLAIN (no ANALYZE) taking an hour for INSERT FROM SELECT
Следующее
От: Jim Nasby
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: PG 9.3 materialized view VS Views, indexes, shared memory