Re: object description for FDW user mappings

On 06-03-2015 AM 01:32, Tom Lane wrote:
> Alvaro Herrera <alvherre@2ndquadrant.com> writes:
>>     appendStringInfo(&buffer, _("user mapping for %s in server %s"), usename,
>>                  srv->servername);
> 
> +1 for the concept, but to be nitpicky, "in" doesn't seem like the right
> word here.  "on server" would read better to me; or perhaps "at server".
> 

One more option may be "for server" (reading the doc for CREATE USER MAPPING)

Thanks,
Amit