On 03/04/2015 10:28 PM, Tom Lane wrote:
> Peter Eisentraut <peter_e@gmx.net> writes:
>> On 2/13/15 10:20 AM, Teodor Sigaev wrote:
>>> Some of users of intarray contrib module wish to use its features with
>>> another kind of arrays, not only for int4 type. Suggested module
>>> generalizes intarray over other (not all) types op pgsql.
>> I think this module should be merged with the intarray module. Having
>> two modules with very similar functionality would be confusing.
> Perhaps. I think it would be hard to remove intarray without breaking
> things for existing users of it; even if the functionality remains under
> another name. And surely we don't want to generalize intarray while
> keeping that same name. So it might be hard to get to a clean solution.
>
> Speaking of names, I can't avoid the feeling that it is a seriously bad
> idea to name an extension the same thing as an existing core type.
>
>
+1. We have far too much experience already of this type of naming
confusion.
cheers
andrew