Re: Odd behavior of updatable security barrier views on foreign tables

On 2015/03/02 5:28, Stephen Frost wrote:
> * Dean Rasheed (dean.a.rasheed@gmail.com) wrote:
>> I just spotted a trivial bug in this patch -- in
>> expand_security_quals() you need to set targetRelation = false inside
>> the loop, otherwise it will be true for the target relation and all
>> that follow it.

> I've pushed a fix for this.

Thanks!

Best regards,
Etsuro Fujita