Re: INSERT ... ON CONFLICT {UPDATE | IGNORE} 2.0

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
От Heikki Linnakangas
Тема Re: INSERT ... ON CONFLICT {UPDATE | IGNORE} 2.0
Дата
Msg-id 54CFA93D.9080609@vmware.com
обсуждение исходный текст
Ответ на Re: INSERT ... ON CONFLICT {UPDATE | IGNORE} 2.0  (Peter Geoghegan <pg@heroku.com>)
Список pgsql-hackers
On 01/30/2015 01:38 AM, Peter Geoghegan wrote:
> I have not addressed the recently described problems with exclusion
> constraints. I hope we can do so shortly. Simply removing IGNORE
> support until such time as we straighten that all out (9.6?) seems
> like the simplest solution. No need to block the progress of "UPSERT",
> since exclusion constraint support was only ever going to be useful
> for the less compelling IGNORE variant. What do other people think? Do
> you agree with my view that we should shelve IGNORE support for now,
> Heikki?

No, I don't agree. Let's fix it.

- Heikki




В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления:

Предыдущее
От: Heikki Linnakangas
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: INSERT ... ON CONFLICT {UPDATE | IGNORE} 2.0
Следующее
От: Robert Haas
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: Odd behavior of updatable security barrier views on foreign tables