On 01/28/2015 04:26 PM, David Fetter wrote:
> On Wed, Jan 28, 2015 at 04:10:42PM -0500, Tom Lane wrote:
>> David Fetter <david@fetter.org> writes:
>>> While investigating another project, namely adding pg_hba.conf support
>>> to pgbouncer, I ran into a stumbling block others probably will, too:
>>> the hba code is backend-only, which means that if I were to do this
>>> as-is, I would be cooking a batch of very unappetizing copypasta.
>>> I'm allergic to copypasta, so unless there are big objections, I'd
>>> like to export those functions to make hba available to other code.
>> How exactly would exporting those functions help anything client-side?
> Right now, pgbouncer, and aspirational things like it--other
> connection poolers, maybe distributed transaction managers, etc.--can
> fairly easily act almost like a direct connection to PostgreSQL,
> except for some important exceptions. One that's cropped up several
> times is the ability to gate auth by network and user, that being what
> pg_hba.conf allows.
>
> A conversation with Andrew Dunstan since I posted convinced me that
> the amount of work to separate this cleanly and have it perform
> somewhere in the close range of as well as it does now could be pretty
> significant.
>
I should add that I am working on an hba facility for pgbouncer. It's
currently in trial. I did pull in a few pieces of the core hba code, but
not a great deal - mainly to do with handling IP addresses and masks.
cheers
andrew