Re: advance local xmin more aggressively

On 01/15/2015 09:57 PM, Robert Haas wrote:
> On Thu, Jan 15, 2015 at 3:08 AM, Michael Paquier
> <michael.paquier@gmail.com> wrote:
>> On Mon, Dec 22, 2014 at 7:31 PM, Heikki Linnakangas
>> <hlinnakangas@vmware.com> wrote:
>>> Here's an updated version, rebased over the pairing heap code that I just
>>> committed, and fixing those bugs.
>> So, are we reaching an outcome for the match happening here?
>
> Well, I still like using the existing ResourceOwner pointers to find
> the snapshots more than introducing a separate data structure just for
> that.  But I'm OK with Heikki committing his version and, if anybody
> notices the new code becoming a hotspot, we can revisit the issue.

Ok, committed.

- Heikki