On 01/06/2015 10:39 PM, Peter Eisentraut wrote:
> If this ends up shipping, it's going to be a massively popular tool. I
> see it as a companion to pg_basebackup. So it should sort of work the
> same way. One problem is that it doesn't use the replication protocol,
> so the setup is going to be inconsistent with pg_basebackup. Maybe the
> replication protocol could be extended to provide the required data.
> Maybe something as simple as "give me this file" would work.
Yeah, that would be nice. But I think we can live with it as it is for
now, and add that later.
> That might lose the local copy mode, but how important is that?
> pg_basebackup doesn't have that mode. In any case, the documentation
> doesn't explain this distinction. The option documentation is a bit
> short in any case, but it's not clear that you can choose between local
> and remote mode.
Changing the libpq mode to use additional replication protocol commands
would be a localized change to libpq_fetch.c. No need to touch the local
copy mode.
> The test suite should probably be reimplemented in Perl. (I might be
> able to help.) Again, ingenious, but it's very hard to follow the
> sequence of what is being tested. And some Windows person is going to
> complain. ;-)
Yeah, totally agreed.
- Heikki