Re: Proposal "VACUUM SCHEMA"

On 12/23/14, 8:54 AM, Fabrízio de Royes Mello wrote:
>  > Right now a lot of people just work around this with things like DO blocks, but as mentioned elsewhere in the
threadthat fails for commands that can't be in a transaction.
 
>  >
>
> I use "dblink" to solve it. :-)

So... how about instead of solving this only for vacuum we create something generic? :) Possibly using Robert's
backgroundworker work?
 
-- 
Jim Nasby, Data Architect, Blue Treble Consulting
Data in Trouble? Get it in Treble! http://BlueTreble.com