On 12/23/14, 8:54 AM, Fabrízio de Royes Mello wrote:
> > Right now a lot of people just work around this with things like DO blocks, but as mentioned elsewhere in the
threadthat fails for commands that can't be in a transaction.
> >
>
> I use "dblink" to solve it. :-)
So... how about instead of solving this only for vacuum we create something generic? :) Possibly using Robert's
backgroundworker work?
--
Jim Nasby, Data Architect, Blue Treble Consulting
Data in Trouble? Get it in Treble! http://BlueTreble.com