Re: DROP PRIVILEGES OWNED BY

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
От Marko Tiikkaja
Тема Re: DROP PRIVILEGES OWNED BY
Дата
Msg-id 5491B2B7.8060708@joh.to
обсуждение исходный текст
Ответ на Re: DROP PRIVILEGES OWNED BY  (Heikki Linnakangas <hlinnakangas@vmware.com>)
Ответы Re: DROP PRIVILEGES OWNED BY  (Michael Paquier <michael.paquier@gmail.com>)
Список pgsql-hackers
On 12/17/14 5:37 PM, Heikki Linnakangas wrote:
> On 12/15/2014 02:43 AM, Marko Tiikkaja wrote:
>> The syntax is:
>>
>>      DROP PRIVILEGES OWNED BY role [, ...]
>
> DROP seems like the wrong verb here. DROP is used for deleting objects,
> while REVOKE is used for removing permissions from them. REVOKE already
> has something similar:
>
> REVOKE ALL PRIVILEGES ON ALL TABLES IN SCHEMA public FROM heikki;
>
> Following that style, how about making the syntax:
>
> REVOKE ALL PRIVILEGES FROM <role>;

I don't have a problem with that.  It would probably work, too, since 
FROM is already fully reserved.


.marko



В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления:

Предыдущее
От: Heikki Linnakangas
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: DROP PRIVILEGES OWNED BY
Следующее
От: Andrew Dunstan
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: [alvherre@2ndquadrant.com: Re: no test programs in contrib]