Re: DROP PRIVILEGES OWNED BY
| От | Marko Tiikkaja |
|---|---|
| Тема | Re: DROP PRIVILEGES OWNED BY |
| Дата | |
| Msg-id | 5491B2B7.8060708@joh.to обсуждение исходный текст |
| Ответ на | Re: DROP PRIVILEGES OWNED BY (Heikki Linnakangas <hlinnakangas@vmware.com>) |
| Ответы |
Re: DROP PRIVILEGES OWNED BY
|
| Список | pgsql-hackers |
On 12/17/14 5:37 PM, Heikki Linnakangas wrote: > On 12/15/2014 02:43 AM, Marko Tiikkaja wrote: >> The syntax is: >> >> DROP PRIVILEGES OWNED BY role [, ...] > > DROP seems like the wrong verb here. DROP is used for deleting objects, > while REVOKE is used for removing permissions from them. REVOKE already > has something similar: > > REVOKE ALL PRIVILEGES ON ALL TABLES IN SCHEMA public FROM heikki; > > Following that style, how about making the syntax: > > REVOKE ALL PRIVILEGES FROM <role>; I don't have a problem with that. It would probably work, too, since FROM is already fully reserved. .marko
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: