Re: Add on_trusted_init and on_untrusted_init to plperl UPDATED [PATCH]

Alex Hunsaker <badalex@gmail.com> writes:
> Yeah the both is gross.  How about:
> plperl.on_plperl_init
> plperl.on_plperlu_init
> plperl.on_init ?

I like the first two.  The problem of selecting a good name for the
third one is easily solved: don't have it.  What would it be except
a headache and a likely security problem?
        regards, tom lane