Re: Fix memory leak in gist_page_items() of pageinspect
| От | Chao Li |
|---|---|
| Тема | Re: Fix memory leak in gist_page_items() of pageinspect |
| Дата | |
| Msg-id | 5484DB5D-813C-4743-8BD1-7DF677FA5D98@gmail.com обсуждение исходный текст |
| Ответ на | Re: Fix memory leak in gist_page_items() of pageinspect (Bertrand Drouvot <bertranddrouvot.pg@gmail.com>) |
| Список | pgsql-hackers |
> On Dec 19, 2025, at 18:26, Bertrand Drouvot <bertranddrouvot.pg@gmail.com> wrote: > > Hi, > > On Fri, Dec 19, 2025 at 05:36:51PM +0800, Japin Li wrote: >> On Fri, 19 Dec 2025 at 08:23, Bertrand Drouvot <bertranddrouvot.pg@gmail.com> wrote: >>> Yeah that would not hurt. What about before the relation_open() calls? >>> >>> " >>> Use relation_open() and not index_open() to avoid the validate_relation_kind() >>> check as we handle relation validation separately below. >>> " >>> >> >> LGTM. > > Thanks! Done that way in the attached. > > Regards, > > -- > Bertrand Drouvot > PostgreSQL Contributors Team > RDS Open Source Databases > Amazon Web Services: https://aws.amazon.com > <v3-0001-Use-relation_close-more-consistently.patch> LGTM. As the immediately following statement is if (!IS_INDEX(rel)), adding a comment to relation_open() feels very necessary. Best regards, -- Chao Li (Evan) HighGo Software Co., Ltd. https://www.highgo.com/
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: