Well, let's say I want to have compact graphs :)
So, few comments on graphs:
- Title: compact name of test and execution conditions
- X-axis: is always representing time scale
- Y-axis: is showing a value level (whatever)
- Legend: gives you a value Name and its metric (KB/s, Op/s, TPS, etc)
TPS: (transactions per second)
- ALL-tps TR_all: all transactions (READ+WRITE) per second level
- ALL-tps TR_Read: only READ tps level
- ALL-tps TR_Write: only WRITE tps level
I must say I was more intrested by databases tuning rather documenting
each my step... But well, without documenting there is no result :)
As well I did not think to compare database initially (don't know why
but it's always starting a small war between DB vendors :)), but
results were so surprising so I just continued until it was possible
:))
Rgds,
-Dimitri
On 5/31/07, Alexander Staubo <alex@purefiction.net> wrote:
> On 5/31/07, Dimitri <dimitrik.fr@gmail.com> wrote:
> > just wanted to share some benchmark results from one long performance
> > study comparing MySQL, PostgreSQL and Oracle transactions throughput
> > and engine scalability on T2000 and V890 (under Solaris).
>
> Interesting, if awfully cryptic. The lack of axis labels, the lack of
> axis normalization, and the fact that you put the graphs for different
> databases and parameters on separate pages makes it rather hard to
> compare the various results.
>
> Alexander.
>