Re: consistently use "ProcSignal" instead of "procsignal" in code comments

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
От Fujii Masao
Тема Re: consistently use "ProcSignal" instead of "procsignal" in code comments
Дата
Msg-id 54723fc8-46e6-ee4d-aa93-e932506302a3@oss.nttdata.com
обсуждение исходный текст
Ответ на Re: consistently use "ProcSignal" instead of "procsignal" in code comments  (Michael Paquier <michael@paquier.xyz>)
Список pgsql-hackers

On 2021/11/09 13:01, Michael Paquier wrote:
> On Tue, Nov 09, 2021 at 12:51:39PM +0900, Fujii Masao wrote:
>> I'm fine with this. Barring any objection, I will commit the patch.
> 
> I have to admit that the timing is kind of odd, or strange, or both,
> because I was just going through my backlog from -hackers, and just
> bumped on this thread like 15 minutes ago..

:)


>  And the patch was fine on
> consistency ground, so I have just applied it now.

Thanks!

Regards,

-- 
Fujii Masao
Advanced Computing Technology Center
Research and Development Headquarters
NTT DATA CORPORATION



В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления:

Предыдущее
От: Michael Paquier
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: consistently use "ProcSignal" instead of "procsignal" in code comments
Следующее
От: Dilip Kumar
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: Skipping logical replication transactions on subscriber side