Re: Add shutdown_at_recovery_target option to recovery.conf
| От | Petr Jelinek |
|---|---|
| Тема | Re: Add shutdown_at_recovery_target option to recovery.conf |
| Дата | |
| Msg-id | 546CC124.5010501@2ndquadrant.com обсуждение исходный текст |
| Ответ на | Re: Add shutdown_at_recovery_target option to recovery.conf (Simon Riggs <simon@2ndQuadrant.com>) |
| Ответы |
Re: Add shutdown_at_recovery_target option to recovery.conf
|
| Список | pgsql-hackers |
On 19/11/14 17:04, Simon Riggs wrote: > On 19 November 2014 15:57, Andres Freund <andres@2ndquadrant.com> wrote: >> On 2014-11-19 15:47:05 +0000, Simon Riggs wrote: >>>> Also, for the Shutdown itself, why are we not using >>>> kill(PostmasterPid, SIGINT)? >>> >>> Done >> >> I don't think that's ok. The postmaster is the one that should be in >> control, not some subprocess. >> >> I fail to see the win in simplicity over using exit (like we already do >> for the normal end of recovery!) is. The issue with the log line seems >> perfectly easily to avoid by just checking the exit code in >> postmaster.c. > > We need to be able to tell the difference between a crashed Startup > process and this usage. > > As long as we can tell, I don't mind how we do it. > > Suggestions please. > Different exit code? -- Petr Jelinek http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/ PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Training & Services
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: