Re: REINDEX CONCURRENTLY 2.0

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
От Peter Eisentraut
Тема Re: REINDEX CONCURRENTLY 2.0
Дата
Msg-id 5465215D.2060505@gmx.net
обсуждение исходный текст
Ответ на Re: REINDEX CONCURRENTLY 2.0  (Andres Freund <andres@2ndquadrant.com>)
Ответы Re: REINDEX CONCURRENTLY 2.0  (Andres Freund <andres@2ndquadrant.com>)
Список pgsql-hackers
On 11/12/14 7:31 PM, Andres Freund wrote:
> Yes, it sucks. But it beats not being able to reindex a relation with a
> primary key (referenced by a fkey) without waiting several hours by a
> couple magnitudes. And that's the current situation.

That's fine, but we have, for better or worse, defined CONCURRENTLY :=
does not take exclusive locks.  Use a different adverb for an in-between
facility.




В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления:

Предыдущее
От: Antonin Houska
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: array exclusion constraints
Следующее
От: Robert Haas
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: tracking commit timestamps