On 10/29/2014 11:49 PM, Tory M Blue wrote:
> I looked at pgtune again today and the numbers it's spitting out took me
> back, they are huge. From all historical conversations and attempts a few
> of these larger numbers netted reduced performance vs better performance
> (but that was on older versions of Postgres).
Yeah, pgTune is pretty badly out of date. It's been on my TODO list, as
I'm sure it has been on Greg's.
--
Josh Berkus
PostgreSQL Experts Inc.
http://pgexperts.com