On 11/05/2014 05:01 AM, Petr Jelinek wrote:
> I guess I could port BDR sequences to this if it would help (once we
> have bit more solid agreement that the proposed API at least
> theoretically seems ok so that I don't have to rewrite it 10 times if at
> all possible).
Because the BDR sequences rely on all the other BDR machinery I suspect
that'd be a pretty big thing to review and follow for someone who
doesn't know the BDR code.
Do you think it'd be simple to provide a blocking, transactional
sequence allocator via this API? i.e. gapless sequences, much the same
as typically implemented with SELECT ... FOR UPDATE on a counter table.
It might be more digestible standalone, and would be a handy contrib/
example extension demonstrating use of the API.
-- Craig Ringer http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Training & Services