Re: Convert date and time colums to datetime
| От | Rob Sargent |
|---|---|
| Тема | Re: Convert date and time colums to datetime |
| Дата | |
| Msg-id | 54588BDB-434E-42C4-A412-CC0F5A3DE7FB@gmail.com обсуждение исходный текст |
| Ответ на | Re: Convert date and time colums to datetime (Rich Shepard <rshepard@appl-ecosys.com>) |
| Ответы |
Re: Convert date and time colums to datetime
|
| Список | pgsql-general |
> On Oct 19, 2025, at 1:08 PM, Rich Shepard <rshepard@appl-ecosys.com> wrote: > > On Sun, 19 Oct 2025, Laurenz Albe wrote: > >> That depends on what you do with the table. > > Laurenz, > > That makes sense. > >> Are your SQL statements simple and natural with the current design? >> Then stick with what you have now. > > That's what I'm going to do. I was curious when a timestamp column was more > efficient, or otherwise preferred, since only a couple of my databases have > a table with both date and time. And neither has many rows, but one could be > quite large some time in the future. > > Thanks very much, > > Rich > I think you have to ask why those values were separated in the first place. For instance if they are thought of as a pairin most queries then an alteration might be in order. There can be a large one time cost if these tables occur in a lotof separate sql calls in the business logic. >
В списке pgsql-general по дате отправления: