On 11/1/14 8:04 AM, Petr Jelinek wrote:
> On second thought, maybe those should be pg_get_transaction_committs,
> pg_get_transaction_committs_data, etc.
Please don't name anything "committs". That looks like a misspelling of
something.
There is nothing wrong with
pg_get_transaction_commit_timestamp()
If you want to reduce the length, lose the "get".
> For me the commit time thing feels problematic in the way I perceive it
> - I see commit time as a point in time, where I see commit timestamp (or
> committs for short) as something that can recorded. So I would prefer to
> stick with commit timestamp/committs.
In PostgreSQL, it is pretty clearly established that time is hours,
minutes, seconds, and timestamp is years, months, days, hours, minutes,
seconds. So unless this feature only records the hour, minute, and
second of a commit, it should be "timestamp".