Re: pg_background (and more parallelism infrastructure patches)

On 10/22/14, 7:49 PM, Joshua D. Drake wrote:

> I lean toward a push into core because:

+1

> 3. I am not sure I buy into the super-user argument. Just because the functionality is there, doesn't mean it has to
beused.
 

It's a valid concern, but I think the way to handle it if needed is to limit the number of connections a user can open.
Orperhaps another option would be to change the permissions on the related functions (do we check ACLs for internal
functions?)
-- 
Jim Nasby, Data Architect, Blue Treble Consulting
Data in Trouble? Get it in Treble! http://BlueTreble.com