Re: [Windows,PATCH] Use faster, higher precision timer API

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
От Craig Ringer
Тема Re: [Windows,PATCH] Use faster, higher precision timer API
Дата
Msg-id 5449E6BB.3020001@2ndquadrant.com
обсуждение исходный текст
Ответ на Re: [Windows,PATCH] Use faster, higher precision timer API  (Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com>)
Ответы Re: [Windows,PATCH] Use faster, higher precision timer API
Список pgsql-hackers
On 10/23/2014 09:21 PM, Robert Haas wrote:
> Agreed - I think if you want an error check here it should use elog()
> or ereport(), not Assert().

That's what I originally did, but it's too early for elog.

I'm reluctant to just fprintf(...) to stderr, as there's no way for the
user to suppress that, and it'll be emitted for each backend start.
Though on the other hand it really is a "shouldn't happen" case.

So the options seem to be ignoring the error silently or printing to stderr.

-- Craig Ringer                   http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Training & Services



В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления:

Предыдущее
От: Peter Eisentraut
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: Getting rid of "accept incoming network connections" prompts on OS X
Следующее
От: Etsuro Fujita
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: inherit support for foreign tables