Re: Really strange foreign key constraint problem blocking delete

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
От Andy Colson
Тема Re: Really strange foreign key constraint problem blocking delete
Дата
Msg-id 54315E5E.9030902@squeakycode.net
обсуждение исходный текст
Ответ на Re: Really strange foreign key constraint problem blocking delete  (Adrian Klaver <adrian.klaver@aklaver.com>)
Ответы Re: Really strange foreign key constraint problem blocking delete  (Tim Mickelson <tim_mickelson@bigfoot.com>)
Re: Really strange foreign key constraint problem blocking delete  (Jim Nasby <Jim.Nasby@BlueTreble.com>)
Список pgsql-general
On 10/05/2014 10:00 AM, Adrian Klaver wrote:
> On 10/05/2014 07:37 AM, Tim Mickelson wrote:
>> Sorry about that, the precise version is:  "PostgreSQL 9.1.9 on
>> x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu, compiled by gcc (GCC) 4.4.7 20120313 (Red Hat
>> 4.4.7-3), 64-bit"
>
> Well 9.1 is at .14 now, so on general principles it would be a good idea to upgrade. That being said I do not see
anythingin the release notes from .10 to .14 that applies. Though to be truthful I did not read every line. Before
upgradingyou could try what Andy suggested which is to REINDEX(tmpautenticazione). See here for the REINDEX caveats,
anda way to INDEX CONCURRENTLY: 
>
> http://www.postgresql.org/docs/9.1/interactive/sql-reindex.html
>
>>
>>

I thought .11 sounded like a good candidate.  Especially the part:

allowing tuples to escape freezing, causing those rows to become invisible once 2^31 transactions have elapsed

-Andy


В списке pgsql-general по дате отправления:

Предыдущее
От: Adrian Klaver
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: Really strange foreign key constraint problem blocking delete
Следующее
От: Shingo horiuchi
Дата:
Сообщение: How does PostgerSQL planner decide driving table