Re: why two dashes in extension load files

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
От David E. Wheeler
Тема Re: why two dashes in extension load files
Дата
Msg-id 542EEE28-2C0E-4663-A991-6246EC5DA70F@kineticode.com
обсуждение исходный текст
Ответ на Re: why two dashes in extension load files  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
Ответы Re: why two dashes in extension load files  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
Список pgsql-hackers
On Feb 14, 2011, at 8:54 AM, Tom Lane wrote:

>> I'm not convinced.  There was nothing in that discussion why any
>> particular character would have to be allowed in a version number.
> 
> Well, there's already a counterexample in the current contrib stuff:
> uuid-ossp.  We could rename that to uuid_ossp of course, but it's
> not clear to me that there's consensus for forbidding dashes here.

I'd be fine if commas were used instead.

Best,

David


В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления:

Предыдущее
От: Dimitri Fontaine
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: Extensions vs PGXS' MODULE_PATHNAME handling
Следующее
От: Stephen Frost
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: pg_ctl failover Re: Latches, signals, and waiting