On 09/27/2014 10:52 PM, Tom Lane wrote:
> Andrew Dunstan <andrew@dunslane.net> writes:
>> On 09/27/2014 06:27 PM, Tom Lane wrote:
>>> So my vote is for a separate function and no optional arguments.
>> You mean like row_to_json_no_nulls() and json_agg_no_nulls()?
> I thought you were proposing that we should revert the committed patch
> lock-stock-n-barrel, and instead invent json_strip_null_fields().
> That's instead, not in addition to. Even if you weren't saying that
> exactly, that's where my vote goes.
I was just exploring alternatives. But I think that's where my vote goes
too.
cheers
andrew