Re: large table
| От | John R Pierce |
|---|---|
| Тема | Re: large table |
| Дата | |
| Msg-id | 54207C8D.5050707@hogranch.com обсуждение исходный текст |
| Ответ на | Re: large table (Luke Coldiron <lukecoldiron@hotmail.com>) |
| Ответы |
Re: large table
Re: large table |
| Список | pgsql-general |
On 9/22/2014 12:33 PM, Luke Coldiron wrote: > > It is possible and that is part of what I am trying to discover > however I am very familiar with the system / code base and in this > case there is a single process updating the timestamp and a single > process reading the timestamp. There are no other user processes > programmed to interact with this table outside of potentially what > Postgres is doing. ANY other connection to the same postgres server, even to a different database, that has an open long running transaction (most frequently, "Idle In Transaction") will block autovacuum from marking the old tuples as reusable. -- john r pierce 37N 122W somewhere on the middle of the left coast
В списке pgsql-general по дате отправления: