Re: Precedence of standard comparison operators

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
От Tom Lane
Тема Re: Precedence of standard comparison operators
Дата
Msg-id 5419.1426094668@sss.pgh.pa.us
обсуждение исходный текст
Ответ на Re: Precedence of standard comparison operators  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
Ответы Re: Precedence of standard comparison operators  (Kevin Grittner <kgrittn@ymail.com>)
Список pgsql-hackers
I wrote:
> Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com> writes:
>> On Tue, Mar 10, 2015 at 1:12 PM, Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote:
>>> Another possibility is to leave it on through beta testing with the intent
>>> to turn it off before 9.5 final; that would give us more data about
>>> whether there are real issues than we're likely to get otherwise.

>> To my mind, the fact that we're doing this at all is largely
>> predicated on the fact that there won't be many real issues.  So I
>> think the goal of the debugging messages ought to be to let those
>> people who discover that they do have issues track them down more
>> easily, not to warn people.  Warning is sort of closing the barn door
>> after the horse has got out: hey, by the way, I just broke your app.

> Agreed, but in the near term we need to *find out* whether there will
> be many real issues.  Perhaps having the warnings on by default would
> help that, or perhaps not; I'm not sure.

Given the lack of enthusiasm about that argument, I've pushed the patch
with warnings off by default.  It's certainly easy enough to change that
aspect later if we choose to.
        regards, tom lane



В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления:

Предыдущее
От: Alvaro Herrera
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: One question about security label command
Следующее
От: Greg Stark
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: Providing catalog view to pg_hba.conf file - Patch submission