Re: Trigger transaction isolation

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
Искать
От
Tom Lane
Тема
Re: Trigger transaction isolation
Дата
Msg-id
54137.1598972521@sss.pgh.pa.us
Ответ на
Список
Дерево обсуждения
Trigger transaction isolation Dirk Lattermann <dlatt@alqualonde.de>
Re: Trigger transaction isolation Dirk Lattermann <dlatt@alqualonde.de>
Re: Trigger transaction isolation Adrian Klaver <adrian.klaver@aklaver.com>
Re: Trigger transaction isolation Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
Re: Trigger transaction isolation Dirk Lattermann <dlatt@alqualonde.de>
Adrian Klaver  writes:
> As I understand it a trigger function runs in its own transaction so the 
> rules from below apply:
> https://www.postgresql.org/docs/12/transaction-iso.html

No, a trigger is part of the calling transaction.  There's nothing special
about it other than the condition causing the call; visibility rules are
the same as for any other function.  So the answer to the OP's question
depends on the transaction's isolation level and (for typical
PLs) on whether the function is VOLATILE or not.

serializable -> the transaction's initial snapshot is used throughout

non serializable, volatile function -> each statement in the function
takes a fresh snapshot

non serializable, non-volatile function -> the function uses a single
snapshot.  For a non-deferred trigger, I think it shares the snapshot
used by the triggering query.  Not sure about exactly when the snapshot
is taken for a deferred trigger.

			regards, tom lane


В списке pgsql-general по дате отправления
От: Adrian Klaver
Дата:
От: Michael Lewis
Дата:
FAQ