On 09/12/2014 08:59 PM, Fabien COELHO wrote:
>
>> The output would look something like this (modified from the manual's example
>> by hand, so the numbers don't add up):
>>
>> 0 199 2241 0 1175850568 995598 1020
>> 0 200 2465 0 1175850568 998079 1010
>> 0 201 skipped 1175850569 608 3011
>> 0 202 skipped 1175850569 608 2400
>> 0 203 skipped 1175850569 608 1000
>> 0 204 2513 0 1175850569 608 500
>> 0 205 2038 0 1175850569 2663 500
>
> My 0.02€: ISTM that the number of columns should stay the same whether it
> is skipped or not, so the "file_no" should be kept.
Oh, sorry, I totally agree. I left file_no out by mistake.
> Maybe to keep it a
> number would make sense (-1) or just a sign (-) which means "no value"
> with gnuplot for instance. Or "skipped".
>
> Basically I would be fine with that, but as I do not use the log file
> feature I'm not sure that my opinion should count.
>
> Note that there are also potential issues with the aggregate logging and
> the sampling stuff.
Yep.
- Heikki