> On 6 Nov 2020, at 00:36, Michael Paquier <michael@paquier.xyz> wrote:
> I still don't see the point of this extra complexity, as
> USE_OPENSSL_RANDOM implies USE_OPENSSL,
As long as we're sure that we'll remember to fix this when that assumption no
longer holds (intentional or unintentional) then it's fine to skip and instead
be defensive in documentation rather than code.
cheers ./daniel