Re: idle_in_transaction_timeout
| От | Josh Berkus |
|---|---|
| Тема | Re: idle_in_transaction_timeout |
| Дата | |
| Msg-id | 53A9C655.60808@agliodbs.com обсуждение исходный текст |
| Ответ на | Re: idle_in_transaction_timeout (Andrew Dunstan <andrew@dunslane.net>) |
| Список | pgsql-hackers |
On 06/24/2014 10:17 AM, Tom Lane wrote: > Josh Berkus <josh@agliodbs.com> writes: >> On 06/23/2014 03:52 PM, Andres Freund wrote: >>> True. Which makes me wonder whether we shouldn't default this to >>> something non-zero -- even if it is 5 or 10 days. > >> I'd go for even shorter: 48 hours. I'd suggest 24 hours, but that would >> trip up some users who just need really long pg_dumps. > > FWIW, I do not think we should have a nonzero default for this. > We could not safely set it to any value that would be small enough > to be really useful in the field. 48 hours would actually be a useful value; I've dealt multiple times with newbie users who had a transaction which had been open for a week. -- Josh Berkus PostgreSQL Experts Inc. http://pgexperts.com
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: