Re: idle_in_transaction_timeout

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
От Josh Berkus
Тема Re: idle_in_transaction_timeout
Дата
Msg-id 53A36523.4090700@agliodbs.com
обсуждение исходный текст
Ответ на Re: idle_in_transaction_timeout  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
Ответы Re: idle_in_transaction_timeout
Re: idle_in_transaction_timeout
Список pgsql-hackers
Tom,

> ISTM our realistic options are for seconds or msec as the unit.  If it's
> msec, we'd be limited to INT_MAX msec or around 600 hours at the top end,
> which seems like enough to me but maybe somebody thinks differently?
> Seconds are probably OK but I'm worried about somebody complaining that
> that's not enough resolution, especially as machines get faster.

I can picture a 500ms timeout more readily than I can picture a 1000hr
timeout.

-- 
Josh Berkus
PostgreSQL Experts Inc.
http://pgexperts.com



В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления:

Предыдущее
От: Tom Lane
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: idle_in_transaction_timeout
Следующее
От: "MauMau"
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: [bug fix] Memory leak in dblink