Re: idle_in_transaction_timeout

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
От Marko Tiikkaja
Тема Re: idle_in_transaction_timeout
Дата
Msg-id 53A226B4.6000102@joh.to
обсуждение исходный текст
Ответ на Re: idle_in_transaction_timeout  (Josh Berkus <josh@agliodbs.com>)
Список pgsql-hackers
On 2014-06-19 1:46 AM, Josh Berkus wrote:
> Robert's right, not killing the "BEGIN;" only transactions is liable to
> result in user confusion unless we label those sessions differently in
> pg_stat_activity.

Wouldn't they be labeled differently already?  i.e. the last query would 
be "BEGIN".  Unless your app tries to unsuccessfully use nested 
transactions, you would know why it hasn't been killed.


.marko



В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления:

Предыдущее
От: Josh Berkus
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: idle_in_transaction_timeout
Следующее
От: Josh Berkus
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: idle_in_transaction_timeout