On 6/5/14, 9:54 PM, Tom Lane wrote:
> Rod Taylor <rod.taylor@gmail.com> writes:
>> On Thu, Jun 5, 2014 at 10:27 PM, Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote:
>>> I'm not entirely convinced that it's worth the extra planning cycles,
>>> though. Given the small number of complaints to date, it might not
>>> be worth doing this. Thoughts?
>
>> Would this avoid execution of expensive functions in views when their
>> output is discarded?
>
> Yes, as long as they're not marked volatile and don't return sets.
That would certainly make it useful for us.
--
Jim C. Nasby, Data Architect jim@nasby.net
512.569.9461 (cell) http://jim.nasby.net