On 05/26/2014 07:10 AM, Stephen Frost wrote:
> * Tom Lane (tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us) wrote:
>> I don't really object to doing an unlocked check for another such
>> database, but I'm not convinced that additional locking to try to
>> prevent a race is worth its keep.
> +1 on the nannyism, and +1 to ignoring the race.
Okay, I'll submit a new patch with racy nannyism and some grammar
changes that Tom and I have been discussing in private.
--
Vik