Re: functional call named notation clashes with SQL feature

Greg Stark <gsstark@mit.edu> writes:
> I wonder if we could offer something like VARIADIC but allows
> arbitrarily named parameters which get passed in a hstore-like hash
> instead of an array. Just thinking aloud here. I haven't thought about
> what this would mean in the function call api.

Yeah, with an extra keyword to disambiguate, you could make that work.
Not sure if there are enough use-cases to justify it though.
        regards, tom lane