Re: now() vs transaction_timestamp()

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
От Tom Lane
Тема Re: now() vs transaction_timestamp()
Дата
Msg-id 5370.1538775167@sss.pgh.pa.us
обсуждение исходный текст
Ответ на Re: now() vs transaction_timestamp()  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
Список pgsql-hackers
I wrote:
> So transaction_timestamp() is definitely buggy, but we're not out of the
> woods yet: SQLValueFunction is treated as parallel-safe, but it also has
> some instances that are equivalent to transaction_timestamp and so do not
> work correctly.

Oh, and I notice that timestamp_in and related functions are marked
parallel safe, which is equally broken since the conversion of 'now'
also depends on xactStartTimestamp.

            regards, tom lane


В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления:

Предыдущее
От: Tom Lane
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: now() vs transaction_timestamp()
Следующее
От: David Fetter
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: Early WIP/PoC for inlining CTEs