Re: New pg_lsn type doesn't have hash/btree opclasses

On 05/06/2014 04:59 PM, Heikki Linnakangas wrote:
> On 05/06/2014 05:17 PM, Tom Lane wrote:
>> Andres Freund <andres@2ndquadrant.com> writes:
>>> On 2014-05-06 09:37:54 -0400, Tom Lane wrote:
>>>> Sorry, it is *way* too late for 9.4.
>>
>>> It's imo a regression/oversight introduced in the pg_lsn patch. Not a
>>> new feature.
>>
>> You can argue that if you like, but it doesn't matter.  It's too late
>> for
>> a change as big as that for such an inessential feature.  We are in the
>> stabilization game at this point, and adding features is not the
>> thing to
>> be doing.
>
> FWIW, I agree with Andres that this would be a reasonable thing to
> add. Exactly the kind of oversight that we should be fixing at this
> stage in the release cycle.

I agree as well.

-- 
Vik