Re: [HACKERS] Psql doesn't allow multiple action rules

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
От Tom Lane
Тема Re: [HACKERS] Psql doesn't allow multiple action rules
Дата
Msg-id 5366.903281456@sss.pgh.pa.us
обсуждение исходный текст
Ответ на Psql doesn't allow multiple action rules  (jwieck@debis.com (Jan Wieck))
Ответы Re: [HACKERS] Psql doesn't allow multiple action rules
Список pgsql-hackers
jwieck@debis.com (Jan Wieck) writes:
>     The question is now, should we tell psql that []'s have to be
>     treated like ()'s or should we change the  syntax  of  CREATE
>     RULE in the backends parser from [] to ()?

Is the syntax of CREATE RULE defined by the SQL standard (or modeled
on something else that is in the standard), or are we just making it
up out of whole cloth?

If it's defined by the standard then I think we have no choice but to
change psql.

If it's our own invention, I think switching to () might be a better
idea.  I'm not that worried about changing psql, but I do wonder how
many other applications might "know" a similar amount about SQL
syntax...

            regards, tom lane

В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления:

Предыдущее
От: Tom Lane
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: [HACKERS] int8 type -- call for porting results!
Следующее
От: Bruce Momjian
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: [HACKERS] What I'm working on