Re: Let's start talking features and "theme" for 9.4
| От | Josh Berkus |
|---|---|
| Тема | Re: Let's start talking features and "theme" for 9.4 |
| Дата | |
| Msg-id | 535850D5.6080506@agliodbs.com обсуждение исходный текст |
| Ответ на | Let's start talking features and "theme" for 9.4 (Josh Berkus <josh@agliodbs.com>) |
| Список | pgsql-advocacy |
On 04/23/2014 01:06 PM, Simon Riggs wrote: > On 23 April 2014 20:55, Alvaro Herrera <alvherre@2ndquadrant.com> wrote: >> Simon Riggs wrote: >> >>> Logical Decoding begs the questions "of what?". Changeset Extraction >>> is a better name. >> >> Changeset Extraction sounds too geeky to me. Let me try some >> simplification of it. Why "set"? We capture each change; whether >> together they form a set doesn't matter much. Also, since the changes >> we're talking about occur in the stored data, I propose we use "Data >> Change" rather than "Changeset". Also, why "Extract"? We're not >> extracting these changes after the fact -- rather we capture them as >> they transit through the WAL system. >> >> So, I would propose "Data Change Capture". > > How about "Change Streaming" ? I like that one. -- Josh Berkus PostgreSQL Experts Inc. http://pgexperts.com
В списке pgsql-advocacy по дате отправления: