Re: Re: default opclass for jsonb (was Re: Call for GIST/GIN/SP-GIST opclass documentation)

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
От Petr Jelinek
Тема Re: Re: default opclass for jsonb (was Re: Call for GIST/GIN/SP-GIST opclass documentation)
Дата
Msg-id 535777DA.3000203@2ndquadrant.com
обсуждение исходный текст
Ответ на Re: Re: default opclass for jsonb (was Re: Call for GIST/GIN/SP-GIST opclass documentation)  (Peter Geoghegan <pg@heroku.com>)
Ответы Re: Re: default opclass for jsonb (was Re: Call for GIST/GIN/SP-GIST opclass documentation)  (Bruce Momjian <bruce@momjian.us>)
Список pgsql-hackers
On 23/04/14 00:40, Peter Geoghegan wrote:
> On Tue, Apr 22, 2014 at 3:32 PM, Bruce Momjian <bruce@momjian.us> wrote:
>> Where are we on the default JSONB opclass change?
>
> FWIW, I still don't have any strong opinion here. I defer to others on
> this question.
>

I vote for changing it, even though neither option is ideal I think that 
given the nature of datatype the current default will break inserts for 
common usage pattern and that's much worse than not being able to use 
the index for some operators.


--  Petr Jelinek                  http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/ PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Training &
Services



В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления:

Предыдущее
От: Andres Freund
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: Missing pfree in logical_heap_rewrite_flush_mappings()
Следующее
От: David Rowley
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: 9.4 Proposal: Initdb creates a single table