Hi, Thomas!
On 14.02.2023 06:38, Anton A. Melnikov wrote:
> Also i did several experiments with fsync=on and found more appropriate behavior:
> The stress test with sizeof(ControlFileData) = 512+8 = 520 bytes failed in a 4,5 hours,
> but the other one with ordinary sizeof(ControlFileData) = 296 not crashed in more than 12 hours.
Nonetheless it crashed after 18 hours:
2023-02-13 18:07:21.476 MSK [7640] LOG: starting PostgreSQL 16devel, compiled by Visual C++ build 1929, 64-bit
2023-02-13 18:07:21.483 MSK [7640] LOG: listening on IPv6 address "::1", port 5432
2023-02-13 18:07:21.483 MSK [7640] LOG: listening on IPv4 address "127.0.0.1", port 5432
2023-02-13 18:07:21.556 MSK [1940] LOG: database system was shut down at 2023-02-13 18:07:12 MSK
2023-02-13 18:07:21.590 MSK [7640] LOG: database system is ready to accept connections
@@@@@@@@@@@@@ sizeof(ControlFileData) = 296
2023-02-13 18:12:21.545 MSK [9532] LOG: checkpoint starting: time
2023-02-13 18:12:21.583 MSK [9532] LOG: checkpoint complete: wrote 3 buffers (0.0%); 0 WAL file(s) added, 0 removed, 0
recycled;write=0.003 s, sync=0.009 s, total=0.038 s; sync files=2, longest=0.005 s, average=0.005 s; distance=0 kB,
estimate=0kB; lsn=0/17AC388, redo lsn=0/17AC350
2023-02-14 12:12:21.738 MSK [8676] ERROR: calculated CRC checksum does not match value stored in file
2023-02-14 12:12:21.738 MSK [8676] CONTEXT: SQL statement "SELECT pg_control_system()"
PL/pgSQL function inline_code_block line 1 at PERFORM
2023-02-14 12:12:21.738 MSK [8676] STATEMENT: do $$ begin loop perform pg_control_system(); end loop; end; $$;
So all of the following is incorrect:
> Seems in that case the behavior corresponds to msdn. So if it is possible
> to use fsync() under windows when the GUC fsync is off it maybe a solution
> for this problem. If so there is no need to lock the pg_control file under windows at all.
and cannot be a solution.
Sincerely yours,
--
Anton A. Melnikov
Postgres Professional: http://www.postgrespro.com
The Russian Postgres Company