Re: The case against multixact GUCs

On 04/16/2014 11:22 AM, Andres Freund wrote:
>> I'm serious.  The multixact stuff has been broken since 9.3
>> was released, and it's *still* broken. We can't give users any guidance
>> or tools on how to set multixact stuff, and autovacuum doesn't handle it
>> properly.
> 
> Sorry, but I think you're blowing some GUCs *WAY* out of proportion.

I'm not talking about the GUCs. I'm talking about the data corruption
bugs.  Including the new one this week.

-- 
Josh Berkus
PostgreSQL Experts Inc.
http://pgexperts.com