Re: Signaling of waiting for a cleanup lock?
| От | Jim Nasby |
|---|---|
| Тема | Re: Signaling of waiting for a cleanup lock? |
| Дата | |
| Msg-id | 534C6386.5090200@nasby.net обсуждение исходный текст |
| Ответ на | Re: Signaling of waiting for a cleanup lock? (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>) |
| Список | pgsql-hackers |
On 4/14/14, 12:44 PM, Tom Lane wrote: > Andres Freund<andres@2ndquadrant.com> writes: >> >On 2014-04-14 13:06:21 -0400, Tom Lane wrote: >>> >>In particular I'm not sold on the use-case >>> >>for being able to tell that a process is waiting without being able to >>> >>tell what it's waiting for. I can figure that much out already. >> >You can? How? It could also be io or something else that's problematic. > If the process is not consuming any CPU time at all, it's waiting on > something. (Now admittedly, that might be hard to tell remotely --- > but Simon seems to be assuming you have access to "ps" output.) Right... and then I always find myself wondering what it's actually waiting on. IO? lwlock? Something else? -- Jim C. Nasby, Data Architect jim@nasby.net 512.569.9461 (cell) http://jim.nasby.net
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: