-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
El 02/04/14 09:44, Devrim GÜNDÜZ escribió:
>
>> But now that I think about it, and also talking to some of the
>> packagers from Debian, we could just build one repmgr and place
>> the binaries in /usr/bin/ (which is what Debian does).
>>
>> This would reduce tremendously things related to different
>> versions of PostgreSQL in the spec file.
>>
>> Thoughts?
>
> Debian packaging and our packaging are not identical to each
> other. Also, if you look at the spec file, it is the repmgr that
> installs itself under PostgreSQL binary directory. It uses PGXS for
> that.
I was thinking about Fedora packaging rules, but now I see that if
repmgr is compiled against the Fedora postgresql packages, it will get
installed with all the other binaries in /usr/bin/.
P.D.: I'm going to test a compilation/installation against F19/F20.
Regards,
- --
Martín Marqués http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/
PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Training & Services
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1
Comment: Using GnuPG with Thunderbird - http://www.enigmail.net/
iQEcBAEBAgAGBQJTPEJDAAoJEHsDtEgBAFTSkPEIAI/pawjskHlpTayxS98WVs01
fnFXLSx454zMVXy4dWaKQ+vw9d3/eAgyJ6rvkWak5bniXt2WW2KzO2Gwz9fTjZhe
Qdbhg2N+yMyIFnnMAhzH8RkgLfhHzMMkj8SZgfSoKi4B6rIBArlcZm/G+DNN0hH+
64aSW42X8rvfUv9qVrQIqrDTAj7s47LrWi588m4p5M2DXDbsUYGlWY2/b5XbA+LG
x+xSGzfXSjQjqlAb0LTHe6+fff1JSfxIh0Qf+JNtv5JZCtZ122J9wFa50VbVk0Tq
3dEb7/Dh1l17O39+Sbpe3glcqxHp76kXOyCLfhwoGRbx4lHSwRWb2cekG/yYGTg=
=CVp9
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----