On 03/25/2014 05:23 PM, Sam Saffron wrote:
> Sorry, its part of a rather elaborate docker based upgrade, that
> install is just done to get the binaries, the data is all in a
> completely different location which is untouched.
So there are two instances of 9.2 in play at one time?
The upgrade process is not inadvertently cross referencing the two?
I realize Toms suggestion got you past the error, just trying to figure
what corrupted the system catalogs in the first place. I am assuming the
9.2 instance that became corrupted was running properly until the upgrade?
>
> On Wed, Mar 26, 2014 at 11:20 AM, Adrian Klaver
> <adrian.klaver@aklaver.com> wrote:
>> On 03/25/2014 05:14 PM, Sam Saffron wrote:
--
Adrian Klaver
adrian.klaver@aklaver.com