Re: Partial index locks
От | Vik Fearing |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Partial index locks |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 532CE07F.5000708@dalibo.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Partial index locks (Thom Brown <thom@linux.com>) |
Ответы |
Re: Partial index locks
Re: Partial index locks |
Список | pgsql-hackers |
On 03/22/2014 01:43 AM, Thom Brown wrote: > Hi, > > I've created a table with 1000 partial indexes. Each one matches > exactly one row based on the predicate WHERE id = <value>. > > However, when I perform an UPDATE of a single row in a transaction, > I've noticed that all those partial indexes show up in pg_locks with > RowExclusiveLock. > > Only 2 of those indexes have a reference to the row: the primary key > and a single partial index. > > Is it necessary for a partial index that doesn't include the row to be > involved in locking? What if the update puts the row into one of the other indexes? -- Vik
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: