Re: Review: plpgsql.extra_warnings, plpgsql.extra_errors

On 3/20/14, 12:32 AM, Tom Lane wrote:
> Isn't the entire point to create a framework in which more tests will
> be added later?
>
> Also, adding GUC_LIST_INPUT later is not really cool since it changes
> the parsing behavior for the GUC.  If it's going to be a list, it should
> be one from day zero.

I'm not sure what exactly you mean by this.  If the only allowed values 
are "none", "variable_shadowing" and "all", how is the behaviour for 
those going to change if we make it a list for 9.5?


Regards,
Marko Tiikkaja